Quick context
Where this row sits
Social categoryST
FamilyScheduled Tribe (ST) families
Statewide rank#16
Family rank#2
Category rank#2
Leading districtAdilabad
Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur
Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur accounts for 3,81,895 people and 1,15,189 households in the statewide caste release. It makes up 1.1% of the Telangana population, 10.3% of the ST total, and 10.3% of Scheduled Tribe (ST) families. The largest district count is in Adilabad.
Population3,81,895
Households1,15,189
State share1.1%
ST share10.3%
How to read the percentages
Avoid mixing up the percentage labels
- State share is Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur's share of the Telangana population.
- ST share means this row's share inside the published ST group.
- Scheduled Tribe (ST) families share groups all named ST communities into one family total.
- In the district table, share of statewide caste shows how much each district contributes to Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur's statewide total.
District concentration
Top 5 districts for Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur
-
Adilabad
37.1% of the statewide Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur total 1,41,598 -
Kumarambheem Asifabad
19.7% of the statewide Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur total 75,317 -
Nirmal
9.6% of the statewide Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur total 36,463 -
Mancherial
7.1% of the statewide Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur total 27,203 -
Bhadradri Kothagudem
5.6% of the statewide Gond, Naikpod, Rajgond, Koitur total 21,361
District breakdown
Explore the full district table
Show full district table (33 districts)
| District | Population | Households | Within category % | Share of statewide caste % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adilabad | 1,41,598 | 39,246 | 55.3% | 37.1% |
| Kumarambheem Asifabad | 75,317 | 20,717 | 44.9% | 19.7% |
| Nirmal | 36,463 | 12,152 | 36.1% | 9.6% |
| Mancherial | 27,203 | 8,685 | 35.9% | 7.1% |
| Bhadradri Kothagudem | 21,361 | 7,171 | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| Nizamabad | 18,885 | 6,450 | 14.7% | 5.0% |
| Jayashankar Bhupalpally | 14,774 | 5,223 | 33.8% | 3.9% |
| Jagitial | 9,289 | 3,086 | 30.8% | 2.4% |
| Khammam | 8,165 | 2,921 | 3.8% | 2.1% |
| GHMC | 8,078 | 2,679 | 4.9% | 2.1% |
| Mulugu | 7,937 | 2,736 | 8.2% | 2.1% |
| Peddapalli | 2,525 | 896 | 14.9% | 0.7% |
| Kamareddy | 2,033 | 654 | 2.1% | 0.5% |
| Mahabubabad | 1,731 | 616 | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Rangareddy | 1,594 | 455 | 1.0% | 0.4% |
| Medchal Malkajgiri | 1,101 | 313 | 2.9% | 0.3% |
| Warangal | 489 | 170 | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Hanumakonda | 474 | 154 | 1.6% | 0.1% |
| Sangareddy | 420 | 115 | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Siddipet | 361 | 121 | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Nalgonda | 290 | 96 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Vikarabad | 280 | 76 | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Mahabubnagar | 278 | 73 | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Medak | 252 | 70 | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Karimnagar | 207 | 60 | 1.6% | 0.1% |
| Nagarkurnool | 205 | 60 | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Suryapet | 171 | 70 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Wanaparthy | 103 | 30 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Yadadri Bhuvanagiri | 100 | 30 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Rajanna Sircilla | 95 | 29 | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Jangaon | 50 | 18 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Narayanpet | 43 | 10 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Jogulamba Gadwal | 23 | 7 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Relevant metric tables
Table pages for the related category or subgroup
- Table 1.1: Number of Households Total, Rural
- Table 1.2: Percentage of Households Total, Rural, Urban
- Table 1.3: Population of Telangana Total, Rural
- Table 1.4: Percentage of Population Total, Rural, Urban
- Table 1.5: Average Size of Household in Telangana Total, Rural, Urban
- Table 1.6: Sex-Ratio in Population Total, Rural, Urban
- Table 1.7: Percentage of Children in 0-5 Years Age in Population Total, Rural, Urban
- Table 1.8: Percentage of Children (6-14 Years) in Population Total, Rural, Urban
- Table 1.9: Percentage of Youth (15-29 Years) in Population Total, Rural, Urban
- Table 1.10: Percentage of 30-64 Years in Population Total, Rural, Urban
Source note
Verify sensitive claims against the PDF before publishing
This page is built from the volume-4 caste-population release and district caste tables. Use the linked source PDF to confirm page context, footnotes, and wording before publishing sensitive demographic claims.